Anyanwutaku, K. v. Moore, Margaret

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing sua sponte dismissal of complaint deemed to have been underS 1915(e) and holding that allegations were sufficient to proceed beyond the sua sponte dismissal stage
• construing a document as a Rule 59(e) motion even though the document did not explicitly reference the rule
• finding Heck inapplicable to claim where success in the district court \would have earned nothing more than a 'ticket to get in the door of the parole board' \
• finding Heck inapplicable to claim where success in the district court “would have earned nothing more than a ‘ticket to get in the door of the parole board’ ”
• allowing “confusing pro se complaint” to proceed in light of less stringent pleading standards
• allowing \confusing pro se complaint\ to proceed in light of less stringent pleading standards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).