Skip to main content
· 3/20/1998

Shipping Financial Services Corporation v. William J. Drakos, Duke Petroleum Transport Corporation and Omi Petrolink Corporation

Citations

  • 140 F.3d 129
  • 1998 A.M.C. 1578
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5358
  • 1998 WL 130734

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the preliminary contract doctrine has been applied “somewhat mechanically to brokerage agreements involving ship charters”
  • reviewing a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1)
  • “jurisdiction must be shown affirmatively, and that showing is not made by drawing from the pleadings inferences favorable to the party asserting it”
  • “[JJurisdiction must be shown affirmatively, and that showing is not made by drawing from the pleadings inferences favorable to the party asserting it.”’
  • “[J]urisdiction must be shown affirmatively, and that showing is not made by drawing from the pleadings inferences favorable to the party asserting it.”
  • “[J]urisdiction must be shown affirmatively, and that showing is not made by drawing from the pleadings inferences favorable to the party asserting it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardamone, Leval, Koeltl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.