Greg Curry v. David Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the issue of defendants' actual knowledge should not be resolved on summary judgment but should be \left to the trier of fact\
• holding district court erred in determining defendants had no actual knowledge on summary judgment because inquiry “should have been left to the trier of fact”
• holding that a grievance specifically complaining of a beating at the hands of one guard did not suffice to exhaust a failure-to-protect claim against another guard, not mentioned in the grievance, who stood by and watched
• holding that a grievance specifically complaining of a beating at the hands of one guard did not suffice to exhaust a failure-to-protect claim 13 against another guard, not mentioned in the grievance, who stood by and watched
• holding district court erred in determining defendants had no actual knowledge on summary judgment because inquiry “should have been left to the trier of fact”
• holding that a grievance specifically complaining of a beating at the hands of one guard was not detailed enough to exhaust a failure-to-protect claim against another guard, who allegedly stood by and watched the beating, but who was not mentioned in the grievance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).