Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Third Circuit· 10/25/2005

Gilles v. Davis

Citations

  • 427 F.3d 197
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23001
  • 2005 WL 2739222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the resolution of a criminal case through a pretrial diversion program was not sufficiently favorable to support a malicious prosecution claim
  • holding that “a guilty plea . . . [is] sufficient to bar a subsequent § 1983 claim” under Heck
  • holding that a campus speaker lacked standing to challenge the university’s permit policy because the speaker never applied for a permit
  • observing that burdens such as restitution and imposition of costs are “not consistent with innocence”
  • holding plaintiff's \participation in the ARD program bars his § 1983 claim[ ]\
  • finding that pretrial diversion “constitutes an ‘unfavorable’ period of judicially imposed limitations on freedom” that are “not consistent with innocence” for purposes of tort liability based upon prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scirica, Roth, Fuentes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

117 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Gilles v. Davis

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.