Ethelbah v. Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dissipation occurs if assets are “wasted, dissipated, or converted to non-marital form” and not “expended ‘for marital purposes or normal living expenses’ ” (quoting Jones v. Jones, 942 P.2d 1133, 1139 (Alaska 1997)
• noting that Hansen requires courts to value retirement health insurance benefits based on employer premium subsidies
• noting that Hansen requires courts to value retirement health insurance benefits based on employer premium subsidies
• “We review the trial court’s equitable distribution under an abuse of discretion standard, and will reverse (continued...
• “We review the [superior] court’s equitable distribution under an abuse of discretion standard.”
• “As the trial court concluded, the individual rate ‘most closely approximates the likely premium rate charged by the State for estimated costs of claims, given [the former wife’s] life expectancy and personal circumstances.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).