Koller v. Reft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that superior court is under no obligation to consider documents first presented with motions for reconsideration
• noting that superior court is not obliged to consider documents presented for the first time with a motion for reconsideration
• requiring court to make specific findings to support determination of adjusted income under Rule 90.3
• discussing Rule 90.6(i), which requires parties io split costs for custody investigators unless court finds good cause to change this allocation
• reviewing the divorce exception and applying it in an action closely resembling a divorce
• finding no specific, cognizable request for fee itemization where paying'party \complained frequently about having to pay” and asked his own -attorney for a fee itemization but \never made a motion in court seeking itemization”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).