Lone Wolf v. Lone Wolf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not adequately explain decision awarding father 32 hours of visitation per weekend where there was no evidence he was an unfit parent
• explaining that “the mere existence of [a] custody agreement” is not binding on the court, which “must ‘independently determine what custody arrangement will best serve the child’s interests’ ” (quoting McClain, 716 P.2d at 385)
• remanding for specific findings where court awarded father no visitation during week but mother worked seven days each week
• rejecting appellant’s contention that superior court — presiding over divorce action — had jurisdiction to change minor’s name
• remanding for specific findings where court awarded father no visitation during week but mother worked seven days each week
• describing purpose of attorney’s fees awards in divorce as “to assure that both spouses have the proper means to litigate the divorce action on a fairly equal plane”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).