Ronny M. v. Nanette H.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was an abuse of discretion to allocate all of the visitation expenses to one parent without any further explanation
• holding superior court “need not make express findings on all statutory factors” set forth in AS 25.24.150(c) (quoting Chesser v. Chesser-Witmer, 178 P.3d 1154, 1158 (Alaska 2008))
• “No bias is shown if a judge derives an opinion based on the record, and the opinion is supported by the record.”
• “The court’s approach [awarding joint legal custody with final decision-making authority to mother] is reasonably intended to encourage both parents to communicate and attempt to make decisions about their children . . . .”
• \We have emphasized that the best interests of the child remain paramount ....\
• \The court's approach [awarding joint legal custody with final decision-making authority to mother] is reasonably intended to encourage both parents to communicate and attempt to make decisions about their children . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).