Skip to main content
· 2/17/2006

Fortson v. Fortson

Citations

  • 131 P.3d 451
  • 2006 Alas. LEXIS 23
  • 2006 WL 361931

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an eighteen month pay period was appropriate
  • stating in divorce context that \[c]ash awards are a permissible means of dividing illiquid marital assets where they would not impose a hardship on the paying party \ (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Matthews, Carpeneti, Eastaugh, Fabe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.