Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 11/20/2000

Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.

Citations

  • 232 F.3d 1271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that allowing the plaintiffs to proceed with a new theory of liability at summary judgment after the close of discovery would prejudice the defendants
  • holding that allowing the plaintiffs to proceed with a new theory of 19 liability after the close of discovery would prejudice the defendants
  • concluding that allowing the plaintiffs to proceed with a new theory of liability at summary judgment after the close of discovery would prejudice the defendants
  • holding that allowing the plaintiffs to proceed with a new theory of liability at summary judgment after the close of discovery would prejudice the defendants
  • holding that allowing the plaintiffs to proceed with a new theory of liability after the close of discovery would 27 prejudice the defendants
  • holding that parties cannot introduce new theories to survive 24 summary judgment that were not alleged in the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canby, Fletcher, Scannlain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

230 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.