Desert Empire Bank, Etc. v. Insurance Co. Of North America, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a trial court “should look 11 with particular care at such motive in removal cases, when the presence of a new 12 defendant will defeat the court’s diversity jurisdiction and require a remand to the state 13 court”
• noting that Rule 20 standards are implicated by a motion to amend pleadings to add a new party
• noting that both Rule 15 and Rule 20 standards are implicated by a motion to amend 5 pleadings to add a new party
• considering Rules 15 and 20 in ruling 11 on a request to amend pleadings to add a new defendant
• stating Rule 15 and Rule 20 standards are implicated by a motion to amend 8 pleadings to add a new party
• “[P]laintiff’s petition to amend its 10 pleadings to add [a party] brings into consideration Rules 15 and 20 of the Federal Rules of Civil 11 Procedure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).