Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “carelessness is not compatible with a finding of diligence and offers no reason for a grant of relief’
• concluding that motion to amend filed after pretrial scheduling order deadline must 1 satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16
• concluding that motion to amend filed 10 after pretrial scheduling order deadline must satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil 11 Procedure 16
• concluding that motion to amend filed after pretrial scheduling 19 order deadline must satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16
• holding that 12 Rule 16(b) is a threshold issue when a party seeks to amend a pleading after the deadline in 13 a scheduling order
• concluding that motion to 12 amend filed after pretrial scheduling order deadline must satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule 13 of Civil Procedure 16

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).