E.D. New York· 7/24/2012
K-Beech, Inc. v. John Does 1-37
Citations
- 296 F.R.D. 80
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing concern with early discovery related to downloading of pornographic works
- combining the Arista factors with other factors like abusive litigation tactics
- “the alleged infringer could be the subscriber, a member of his or her family, an employee, invitee, neighbor or interloper”
- “the alleged infringer could be the subscriber, a member of his or her family, an employee, invitee, neighbor or interloper”
- “the alleged infringer could be the subscriber, a member of his or her family, an employee, invitee, neighbor or interloper”
- “the alleged infringer could be the subscriber, a member of his or her family, an employee, invitee, neighbor or interloper”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Wexler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rotten Records, Inc. v. DoeW.D. New York· 2015-06-02· cited 207×
- AF Holdings, LLC v. Does 1-1058D.C. Circuit· 2014-05-27· cited 116×
- Rotten Records, Inc. v. DoeW.D. New York· 2015-06-04· cited 106×
- Glacier Films (Usa), Inc. v. Andrey TurchinNinth Circuit· 2018-07-24· cited 87×
- United States v. McLellanFirst Circuit· 2015-07-06· cited 33×
- Malibu Media, LLC v. DoeE.D. California· 2016-05-13· cited 31×
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DoeW.D. New York· 2018-11-26· cited 15×
- United States v. Joseph LawrenceFifth Circuit· 2019-04-08· cited 12×
- LHF Prods., Inc. v. BoughtonD. Nevada· 2017-10-23· cited 8×
- United States v. MonroeD. Rhode Island· 2018-11-01
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Second Circuit· 2010-04-29· cited 2,656×
- Sony Music Entertainment Inc. v. Does 1-40S.D. New York· 2004-07-26· cited 1,274×
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Ninth Circuit· 2000-11-20· cited 959×
- Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. MuchnickSupreme Court· 2010-03-02· cited 744×
- Digital Sin, Inc. v. Does 1-176S.D. New York· 2012-01-30· cited 538×
- Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Supreme Court· 2003-06-02· cited 486×
- Ayyash v. Bank Al-MadinaS.D. New York· 2005-07-12· cited 150×
- In Re: Aimster Copyright LitigationSeventh Circuit· 2003-06-30· cited 134×
- James Beverly v. Hans Walker, Superintendent of Auburn Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1997-06-30· cited 117×
- United States v. Herbert Marvin FeinbergSeventh Circuit· 1996-07-08· cited 94×
- Savoie v. Merchants BankSecond Circuit· 1996-05-09· cited 72×
- Pacific Century International, Ltd. v. John Does 1-37N.D. Illinois· 2012-03-30· cited 53×
- Liberty Media Holdings, LLC v. Swarn Sharing Hash File AE340D0560129AFEE8D78CE07F2394C7 B5BC9C05D. Massachusetts· 2011-10-31· cited 36×
- United States v. Reuben SturmanSeventh Circuit· 1995-03-14· cited 33×
- Hard Drive Productions, Inc. v. DOES 1-188N.D. California· 2011-08-23· cited 28×
- On the Cheap, LLC v. Does 1-5011N.D. California· 2011-09-06· cited 12×
- DIRECTV, Inc. v. ArmellinoE.D. New York· 2003-07-28· cited 10×
- National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.E.D. New York· 2000-04-18· cited 6×
- Third Degree Films, Inc. v. Does 1-131D. Arizona· 2012-03-01· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.