Acevedo v. Allsup's Convenience Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that proper remedy in a misjoinder case is not “dismiss[al of] this entire action, rather than simply dismissing the claims of any misjoined plaintiffs”
• noting that joinder would be inefficient, as it would be “too challenging logistically”
• explaining the district court may deny joinder for judicial economy purposes or where “different witnesses and documentary proof would be required for plaintiffs’ claims
• affirming district court’s decision to deny Rule 20 joinder of 800 plaintiffs when trying the claims together “would be too challenging logistically”
• noting that neither method has been formally adopted
• noting that neither method has been formally adopted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).