Diaz v. Eagle Produce Ltd. Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reasonable jurors could conclude that deviating from company policy “undermines the credibility of the proffered explanations”
• holding that “no reasonable 5 juror could find that [plaintiff’s] job performance was satisfactory” where she violated 6 company policy
• holding that reasonable jurors could conclude that deviating from company policy “undermines the credibility of the proffered explanations”
• holding that an individual who continues to violate company policy over an extended period of time after receiving a warning has not demonstrated satisfactory performance
• holding that the defendant’s concession that he violated written company policy could be 15 evidence of intent to discriminate and should be considered by the jury
• recognizing that age discrimination plaintiffs must show that they were “performing [their] job satisfactorily”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).