Supreme Court of Florida· 4/27/1995

Windom v. State

Citations

656 So. 2d 432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an inquiry was not necessary where the defendant had not clearly moved to discharge his counsel due to counsel's incompetence
stating that \the presumption of validity of peremptory strikes established in Neil is still the law in Florida\
finding that section 921.141(7) only relates to admission of evidence and is procedural and thus does not violate prohibition against ex post facto laws
noting that Florida statute permitting victim impact evidence allows such evidence \only after there is present in the record evidence of one or more aggravating circumstances.\
rejecting Windom’s argument and reaffirming prior holdings that “contemporaneous convictions prior to sentencing can qualify as previous convictions in multiple conviction situations” (citations omitted)
\Victim impact evidence must be limited to that which is relevant as specified in section 921.141(7).\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

87 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Windom v. State

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.