Doorbal v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims are waived when an appellant “merely refer[s] to arguments presented during the postconviction proceedings without further elucidation”
• recognizing that “[t]o satisfy the “enterprise” element of the RICO statute, the State must demonstrate that a defendant acted in concert with . . . [an] entity”
• “[T]o merely refer to arguments presented during the postconviction proceedings without further elucidation is not sufficient . . . and these claims are deemed to have been waived.”
• “For an issue to be preserved for appeal, it must be presented to the lower court, and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal must be part of that presentation.”
• conclusory argument insufficient to support reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).