Skip to main content

Lugo v. State

Citations

  • 845 So. 2d 74
  • 2003 WL 359291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the evidence substantially proved the defendant was deceitful, remarks challenging the veracity of the defendant were proper comments on the evidence
  • rejecting as meritless the argument that Florida’s capital sentencing scheme “fails to limit the class of persons eligible for the death penalty”
  • addressing relative - 11 - culpability claim under the “Proportionality” heading and as part of traditional comparative proportionality review
  • “[W]e cannot say . . . the prosecution’s comments drifted so far afield from the evidence adduced at trial as to constitute fundamental error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.