Supreme Court of Florida· 2/20/2003
Lugo v. State
Citations
- 845 So. 2d 74
- 2003 WL 359291
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where the evidence substantially proved the defendant was deceitful, remarks challenging the veracity of the defendant were proper comments on the evidence
- rejecting as meritless the argument that Florida’s capital sentencing scheme “fails to limit the class of persons eligible for the death penalty”
- addressing relative - 11 - culpability claim under the “Proportionality” heading and as part of traditional comparative proportionality review
- “[W]e cannot say . . . the prosecution’s comments drifted so far afield from the evidence adduced at trial as to constitute fundamental error.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GravesSupreme Court of Iowa· 2003-09-04· cited 406×
- State v. GonzalesNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-09-02· cited 287×
- England v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-09-28· cited 151×
- Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-06-16· cited 116×
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-09-25· cited 110×
- Zack v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-07-07· cited 103×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-10-18· cited 100×
- Doorbal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-02-14· cited 96×
- Coday v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-10-26· cited 94×
- Daniel Lugo v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2014-04-24· cited 90×
- Duest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-06-26· cited 79×
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-03-23· cited 74×
- Schoenwetter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-04-27· cited 71×
- Farina v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-07-06· cited 64×
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-04-03· cited 57×
- Victorino v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-11-25· cited 54×
- Blackwelder v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-07-03· cited 50×
- Snelgrove v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-11-10· cited 46×
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-09-25· cited 45×
- Rivera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-09-11· cited 36×
Cites
71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoFirst Circuit· 1990-01-10· cited 2,914×
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,771×
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 1,617×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
- United States v. BoylanFirst Circuit· 1990-03-14· cited 393×
- Urbin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-05-07· cited 249×
- Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-03· cited 222×
- Bottoson v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-24· cited 192×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-10-13· cited 175×
- Fotopoulos v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-10-15· cited 155×
- Way v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-20· cited 143×
- King v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-24· cited 139×
- Swafford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-29· cited 134×
- Larzelere v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-07-11· cited 127×
- United States v. BaltasFirst Circuit· 2001-01-02· cited 115×
- Cole v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-09-18· cited 115×
- Larkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-07-08· cited 114×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.