Skip to main content

Francis v. State

Citations

  • 808 So. 2d 110
  • 2001 WL 1628780

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that in Hall this Court \reasoned that the [new] instruction provided sufficient guidance so as to save both the instruction and the aggravator from a vagueness challenge\
  • rejecting argument that defendant was mentally ill at the time and thus could not have intended to cause suffering or torture because intent is not a necessary element of the aggravator
  • finding no improper doubling where the sentencing court merged the pecuniary gain aggravator with during the course of a felony aggravator based on a robbery
  • “It is well established that trial judges have broad discretion in deciding whether to read back testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

101 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

83 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.