Robertson v. Cockrell
Citations
- 325 F.3d 243
- 2003 WL 1204119
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that for evidence to fall within the scope of Penry, there must be a causal nexus between the mitigating evidence and the commission of the crime
- rejecting any suggestion that Penry II silently modified Penry I and encroached upon Jurek
- recognizing the continued vitality of the Teague nonretroactivity doctrine under AEDPA
- rejecting any suggestion that Penry II silently modified Penry I and encroached upon Jurek
- rejecting any suggestion that Penry II silently modified Penry I and encroached upon Jurek
- recognizing continued vitality of Teague nonretroactivity doctrine under AEDPA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barksdale, Benavides, Clement, Davis, Demoss, Dennis, Garza, Higginbotham, Jolly, Jones, King, Smith, Stewart, Wiener
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Tennard v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 1,965×
- Smith v. TexasSupreme Court· 2004-11-15· cited 232×
- Cotton v. CockrellFifth Circuit· 2003-08-22· cited 93×
- Nelson v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2006-12-14· cited 79×
- Bagwell v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2004-06-09· cited 75×
- Ex Parte StaleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-04-27· cited 66×
- Smith v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2005-08-17· cited 63×
- Ex Parte HoodCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-01-10· cited 62×
- Bigby v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2003-07-28· cited 55×
- Coble v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2007-08-14· cited 45×
- Cardenas v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2005-03-29· cited 42×
- Bigby v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2005-03-08· cited 34×
- Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-04-21· cited 33×
- Coble v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2005-07-18· cited 32×
- Smith v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2005-08-18· cited 27×
- Jones v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2004-06-24· cited 26×
- Coble v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2005-07-18· cited 25×
- Coble v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2006-03-22· cited 23×
- Bigby v. CockrellFifth Circuit· 2003-07-28· cited 17×
- Gutierrez v. DretkeW.D. Texas· 2005-09-27· cited 14×
Cites
111 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 4,248×
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,034×
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-04-23· cited 1,983×
- California v. BrownSupreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 1,207×
- Miller v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 2000-02-24· cited 1,099×
- Penry v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2001-06-04· cited 946×
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court· 2000-05-22· cited 903×
- Franklin v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1988-09-15· cited 852×
- Johnson v. TexasSupreme Court· 1993-08-09· cited 750×
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-06-07· cited 713×
Other cases named Robertson v. Cockrell
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.