Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 6/7/2004

Buono v. Norton

Citations

  • 371 F.3d 543
  • 2004 WL 1238143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an eight-foot cross intended as a war memorial and located on land owned by the national government violated the Establishment Clause
  • holding that plaintiff who was “unable to freely use” the area of the Mojave National Preserve around a Latin cross because of the government’s allegedly unconstitutional actions had standing (internal quotation marks, editorial marks, and citation omit- ted)
  • holding that we review de novo a grant of summary judgment
  • noting that presence of a religious symbol on land transferred into private hands might still violate the Establishment Clause, but reserving the question
  • holding a reasonable observer would be aware of religious discrimination in administering the site
  • noting that in a federal case involving multiple plaintiffs, “once the court determines that one of the plaintiffs has standing, it need not decide the standing of the others”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kozinski, Nelson, Restani

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

106 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.