Walls v. Central Contra Costa Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding individual who was not an employee at the time he made his request could 28 not “invoke FMLA protection”
• finding invalid waiver because the agreement did not expressly waive Walls’s 6 pretermination hearing and the agreement’s structure and substance suggested that he was 7 entitled to such a hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).