· 10/27/2008
Sierra Club v. Franklin County Power of Illinois, LLC
Citations
- 546 F.3d 918
- 39 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20271
- 67 ERC (BNA) 2063
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 22309
- 2008 WL 4693519
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that environmental organization had standing to challenge construction of coal plant since member of organization actually used land threatened by expected pollution from plant
- explaining that the \injury-in-fact necessary for standing need not be large\ and that \an identifiable trifle will suffice\
- stating that the injury-in-fact “need not be large, an identifiable trifle will suffice”
- noting that an injury “need not be large, an identifiable trifle will suffice”
- finding that Sierra Club established Article III standing because one of its members stated that she visited the land at issue every other year and would no longer do so due to the alleged environmental harm
- finding that Sierra Club established Article III standing because one of its members stated that she visited the land at issue every other year and would no longer do so due to the alleged environmental harm
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Ripple, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.