Skip to main content
· 12/22/2008

Preminger v. Peake

Citations

  • 552 F.3d 757
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 27478
  • 2008 WL 5273733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing district courts’ “inherent power to control their dockets” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • applying de novo review to standing determination and clear-error review to underlying facts in challenge to agency’s land-into-trust determination under Graton Rancheria Restoration Act
  • reiterating the requirement of “likelihood that a favorable decision will redress the injury”
  • court reviews for abuse of discretion a district court’s decisions concerning its management of litigation
  • court reviews for abuse of discretion a district court’s decisions concerning its management of litigation
  • court reviews for abuse of discretion a district court’s decisions concerning 2 24-5357 its management of litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkins, Graber, Selna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.