Skip to main content
· 6/10/2009

San Diego Police Officers' Ass'n v. San Diego City Employees' Retirement System

Citations

  • 568 F.3d 725
  • 46 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2813
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12702
  • 2009 WL 1607904

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that in Federal Contracts Clause claims “federal courts look to state law to determine the existence of a contract” before using federal principles in conducting Contracts Clause analysis
  • explaining that in Federal Contracts Clause claims “federal courts look to state law to determine the existence of a contract” before using federal principles in conducting Contracts Clause analysis
  • stating that in Contracts Clause analysis, state statutes “must evince a clear and unmistakable indication” of legislature’s intent to form contractual relationship before they may be read to create contract
  • holding 1 remaining against them in the district court, [defendants] were clearly the prevailing 2 parties” and, “[a]s such, they were entitled to the award of costs decreed by the district 3 court”
  • discussing California’s “primary right” approach to 21 determining whether two suits involve the same cause of action
  • discussing California’s “primary right” approach to 22 determining whether two suits involve the same cause of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callahan, Ikuta, Shadur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.