Skip to main content
· 5/9/2006

Moran v. Selig

Citations

  • 447 F.3d 748
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 11464
  • 87 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,351
  • 97 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1825
  • 2006 WL 1229122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that to prove that one is “similarly situated,” a plaintiff must show that they are similarly situated “in all material respects”
  • holding that the complaint may not be relied on at summary judgment stage
  • stating that an unverified 25 complaint cannot be considered as evidence on motion for summary judgment
  • noting that an unverified complaint 7 “cannot be considered as evidence at the summary judgment stage”
  • stating that an unverified 24 complaint cannot be considered as evidence on motion for summary judgment
  • noting that an unverified complaint could not be considered as 13 evidence for purposes of summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, Rawlinson, Fogel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.