Michael J. Conlon v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that first prong of test was 18 satisfied for admissions of lack of causation
• holding that matters deemed admitted, even 13 by default, may be relied on for summary judgment.
• holding that a court must consider both factors in deciding a 22 motion to withdraw or amend
• holding that a failure to respond to requests for admissions within the time period provided will result in the matters set 19 forth in the request for admissions to be admitted for purposes of summary judgment
• explaining that use of the word “may” in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(b) suggests that the district court has discretion in ruling on Rule 36 motions
• explaining that “reliance on a deemed admission in preparing a summary judgment motion does not constitute prejudice” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).