Ninth Circuit· 3/8/1994
Leonard v. Clark
Citations
- 12 F.3d 885
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that once the court determines that one of the plaintiffs has standing, it need not decide the standing of the others
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1995-01-04· cited 368×
- Buono v. NortonNinth Circuit· 2004-06-07· cited 131×
- Western Watersheds Project v. KraayenbrinkNinth Circuit· 2011-01-19· cited 104×
- JONES v. CITY OF LOS ANGELESNinth Circuit· 2006-04-14· cited 57×
- Legal Aid Society v. City of New YorkS.D. New York· 2000-09-18· cited 50×
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyNinth Circuit· 2008-05-23· cited 45×
- Gete v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1997-08-04· cited 45×
- Clark v. Capital Credit & Collection Services, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2006-08-23· cited 42×
- Oregon v. AshcroftNinth Circuit· 2004-05-26· cited 31×
- SEC v. RomerilSecond Circuit· 2021-09-27· cited 22×
- Western Watersheds Project v. KraayenbrinkNinth Circuit· 2010-09-01· cited 19×
- Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. JacobyD. Oregon· 1998-05-08· cited 15×
- Assateague Coastkeeper v. Alan & Kristin Hudson FarmD. Maryland· 2010-07-21· cited 14×
- State v. RossN.D. California· 2019-03-06· cited 6×
- Pittston Coal Group, Inc. v. International Union, United Mine WorkersW.D. Virginia· 1995-08-11· cited 5×
- Steven Preminger v. PeakeNinth Circuit· 2008-08-07· cited 5×
- Western Watersheds Project v. Bureau of Land ManagementE.D. California· 2013-09-04· cited 5×
- Ancheta v. WatadaD. Hawaii· 2001-01-30· cited 4×
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. HVFG LLCN.D. California· 2013-04-12· cited 4×
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. AaronianNinth Circuit· 1996-08-21· cited 2×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 5,791×
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-01-12· cited 4,651×
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 4,525×
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 3,921×
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court· 1967-10-09· cited 1,899×
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 1,298×
- Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court· 1977-06-09· cited 1,185×
- Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 882×
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 590×
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveNinth Circuit· 1989-05-09· cited 511×
- Town of Newton v. RumerySupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 427×
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MullinsSupreme Court· 1982-01-13· cited 394×
- Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie, PennsylvaniaThird Circuit· 1988-07-28· cited 269×
- United States of America, and Lummi Indian Tribe, Intervenor-Appellant v. State of WashingtonNinth Circuit· 1992-06-30· cited 222×
- Lummi Indian Tribe v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 86×
- Leonard v. ClarkNinth Circuit· 1993-12-27· cited 79×
- City and County of San Francisco v. Gaudiya Vaishnava SocietySupreme Court· 1992-05-18· cited 53×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.