Skip to main content

Flores v. State

Citations

  • 513 S.W.3d 146
  • 2016 WL 6990053
  • 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 12593

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding no egregious harm 20 because evidence did not support jury determination that one discrete criminal act occurred but other had not
  • “It is unlikely that the jury’s decision to convict was influenced by the pediatrician’s testimony that he believed complainant’s story to be credible—the same story the jury heard from complainant.”
  • “It is unlikely that the jury’s decision to convict was influenced by the pediatrician’s testimony that he believed complainant’s story to be credible—the same story the jury heard from complainant.”
  • “It is unlikely that the jury’s decision to convict was influenced by the pediatrician’s testimony that he believed complainant’s story to be credible—the same story the jury heard from complainant.”
  • “It is unlikely that the jury’s decision to convict was influenced by the pediatrician’s testimony that he believed complainant’s story to be credible—the same story the jury heard from complainant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyce, Christopher, Jamison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.