Indiana Supreme Court· 7/11/1995
Brown v. State
Citations
- 653 N.E.2d 77
- 1995 WL 406537
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the police violated Article 1, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution when they searched the defendant’s car without a warrant
- holding that because the search of the defendant’s car was unreasonable, the Indiana Constitution “mandate[d]” that the evidence found as a result of the search be suppressed
- noting that protection from unreasonable searches and seizures plays a uniquely important role in the context of criminal procedure
- noting that protection from unreasonable searches and seizures plays a uniquely important role in the context of criminal procedure
- discussing the status of automobiles under Article I, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution
- distinguishing between Article One, Section Eleven and the Fourth Amendment on question of warrantless search of automobile
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Debruler, Shepard, Dickson, Selby, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
131 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-10-01· cited 824×
- Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-04-16· cited 191×
- Holder v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-05-18· cited 164×
- State v. QuirkIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-02-14· cited 131×
- State v. WashingtonIndiana Supreme Court· 2008-12-31· cited 129×
- Baldwin v. ReaganIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-07-06· cited 123×
- McIntosh v. Melroe Co.Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-05-26· cited 110×
- State v. Moss-DwyerIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-10-23· cited 96×
- Finger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-11-26· cited 88×
- State v. GerschofferIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-03-05· cited 87×
- State v. BulingtonIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-01-29· cited 80×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-02-14· cited 76×
- State v. HobbsIndiana Supreme Court· 2010-09-30· cited 64×
- Lyles v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-09-29· cited 60×
- Cheatham v. PohleIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-05-30· cited 56×
- Trowbridge v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-10-04· cited 56×
- Query v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-04-11· cited 55×
- Kenner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-01-06· cited 47×
- Lindsey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-11-09· cited 46×
- Lundquist v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-09-30· cited 45×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 1,554×
- California v. CarneySupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,276×
- Winston v. LeeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 733×
- In re SkolnickSupreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 237×
- Moran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-12-12· cited 151×
- Fair v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 121×
- Callender v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1922-06-23· cited 83×
- Esquerdo v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-10-04· cited 70×
- Fyock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1982-06-29· cited 36×
- Hawkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-14· cited 32×
- Idol v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1954-05-14· cited 30×
- Murphy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-11-12· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.