Indiana Supreme Court· 3/2/1998

Brown v. State

Citations

691 N.E.2d 438
1998 WL 87382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, although defendant did not own the home in which he was staying, he had been living there for two and a half months with his girlfriend and thus had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the premises search (the bedroom)
holding that, although defendant did not own the home in which he was staying, he had been living there for two and a half months with his girlfriend and thus had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the premises search (the bedroom)
noting that “the phrases ‘may look to,’ ‘may infer,’ and ‘may consider,’ are indicative of permissive inferences, not mandatory presumptions”
noting that “the phrases ‘may look to,’ ‘may infer,’ and ‘may consider,’ are indicative of permissive inferences, not mandatory presumptions”
using Davis/Hatton procedure for consideration of claims of instructional error and ineffective assistance of trial counsel
stating that the authority which justifies third-party consent rests on the mutual use, joint access, or control for most purposes so that it is reasonable to recognize that each of the co-inhabitants has the right to permit the common areas to be searched

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Selby, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.