Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 929 N.E.2d 204
  • 2010 Ind. LEXIS 399
  • 2010 WL 2594309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a claim of error asserting that evidence was unlawfully seized, without more, does not constitute fundamental error
  • holding that a claim of error asserting that evidence was unlawfully seized, without more, does not constitute fundamental error
  • holding that a claim of error asserting that evidence was unlawfully seized, without more, does not constitute fundamental error
  • holding that a defendant’s failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection at the time evidence is introduced at trial results in waiver of the error on appeal
  • holding that the defendant was not allowed to challenge admissibility of evidence on appeal where he affirmatively stated he had no objection to evidence offered at trial
  • holding that defendant, who did not object to evidence upon introduction of evidence and who affirmatively stated he had no objection, waived review of his argument that evidence was unlawfully seized

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

176 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.