Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 913 S.W.2d 577
  • 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1
  • 1996 WL 6665

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when venireperson vacillates or equivocates on his or her ability to follow law, reviewing court must defer to trial court’s judgment
  • when the venireperson vacillates or equivocates on the ability to follow the law, the reviewing court must defer to the trial court's judgment
  • if a venireperson testifies unequivocally that she can follow the law despite personal prejudices, then the trial court abuses its discretion by allowing a challenge for cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maloney, Overstreet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.