Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 376 So. 2d 382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a no- contest plea is not permissible unless “the legal issue to be determined on appeal is dispositive of the case”
  • indicating that the nature of a non- dispositive issue makes it, “in effect, an interlocutory appeal,” whereby “the defendant faces the prospect of a trial even if he prevails on appeal”
  • holding competency is not a dispositive issue
  • a conditional nolo plea is permissible only when the legal issue to be determined on appeal is dispositive of the case
  • “Because of the nondispositive nature of the appeal, the defendant faces the prospect of a trial even if he prevails on appeal. The inevitable is not avoided but merely postponed, thus further burdening the already severely taxed resources of our courts.”
  • “[T]o avoid a mini-trial on the sufficiency of the evidence in each case involving a confession, we hold that as a matter of law a confession may not be considered dispositive of the case for purposes of an Ashby nolo plea.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sundberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

163 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.