Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 928 S.W.2d 453
  • 1996 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a lack of knowledge that claims exist does not toll the statute of limitations
  • determining that “the petitioner’s claimed lack of knowledge does not toll the statute for post-conviction purposes”
  • “[T]he petitioner’s grounds for post-conviction relief, ineffective assistance of counsel and involuntary plea, existed at the time of his conviction.”
  • “[A] judgment of conviction is not a contract, and principles of contract law do not apply.”
  • “As a general rule, this court will not address post-conviction issues that were not raised in the petition or addressed in the trial court.” (citation omitted)
  • “Ignorance of statute of limitations is not an excuse for late filing, even when the petitioner claims that he did not learn of the statute’s enactment because he was incarcerated in another state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tipton, Jones, Summers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.