Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 124 So. 2d 481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the alleged error \did not permeate or saturate the trial with such basic invalidity as to lead to a reversal regardless of a timely objection\
  • explaining that fundamental error is error that reaches “down into the validity of the trial itself to the extent that a verdict of guilty could not have been obtained without the assistance of the alleged error”
  • in order for an error to be considered fundamental, it must reach down into the validity of the trial itself to the extent that a verdict of guilty could not have been obtained without the assistance of the error
  • “For an error to be so fundamental that it can be raised for the first time on appeal, the error must be basic to the judicial decision under review and equivalent to the denial of due process.”
  • articulating the standard for fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thornal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

189 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.