Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 890 So. 2d 901
  • 2004 WL 1945528

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the beyond a reasonable doubt requirement does not apply to the determination that the aggravating circumstances outweigh the totality of the mitigating circumstances
  • reversing and remanding for a new trial because of failure to comply with Hatten
  • reversing and remanding for a new trial because of failure to comply with Hatten
  • reversing and remanding for a new trial because of failure to comply with Hatten
  • placing the burden on counsel to request a Rule 404(b) limiting instruction
  • abandoning Smith’s requirement that a trial judge sua sponte give a limiting instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

166 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

229 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.