Indiana Supreme Court· 5/25/2000

Ben-Yisrayl v. State

Citations

729 N.E.2d 102
2000 Ind. LEXIS 483
2000 WL 680419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that the similarities in witnesses and subject matter between penalty phase and post-conviction evidence are such that defense counsel's performance did not fall below reasonable standards
finding that the similarities in witnesses and subject matter between penalty phase and post-conviction evidence are such that defense counsel's performance did not fall below reasonable standards
rejecting defendant’s claim of error regarding jury instructions on “intentionally” or “knowingly” in part because the challenged instruction “defined the terms ‘knowingly’ and ‘intentionally’ precisely as they are defined by statute” (citation omitted)
allegedly prejudicial pre-trial publicity claim not raised on direct appeal reviewable in post-conviction as it reflects on the performance of counsel
appellate court will reverse post- conviction court’s decision only upon demonstration of clear error
appellate court will reverse post-conviction court's decision only upon demonstration of clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

223 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Ben-Yisrayl v. State

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.