Skip to main content
· 9/13/2001

Dewitt v. State

Citations

  • 755 N.E.2d 167
  • 2001 Ind. LEXIS 833
  • 2001 WL 1047552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant failed to prove any resulting prejudice when the address of a gas station that he robbed was misstated during the factual basis at the guilty plea hearing
  • holding that the defendant failed to prove any resulting prejudice when the address of a gas station that he robbed was misstated during the factual basis at the guilty plea hearing
  • rejecting the defendant’s argument that the post- conviction court erred by concluding that the defendant’s decision to plead guilty was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent
  • rejecting the defendant’s argument that the post-conviction court erred by concluding that the defendant’s decision to plead guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent
  • rejecting the defendant’s argument that the post-conviction court erred by concluding that the defendant’s decision to plead guilty was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent
  • defendant knew his rights under Boykin because he had been advised of them during arraignment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rucker, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.