Skip to main content
· 4/4/2013

Daniel Ray Wilkes v. State of Indiana

Citations

  • 984 N.E.2d 1236
  • 2013 WL 1352156
  • 2013 Ind. LEXIS 239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that claims of ineffective assistance of counsel may be proper grounds for post-conviction proceedings
  • explaining that we will affirm a post-conviction court’s discovery ruling absent a showing of clear error and resulting prejudice
  • finding no prejudice where evidence of the defendant’s guilt was overwhelming and the result of the trial would have been the same

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dickson, Rucker, David, Massa, Rush

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.