Indiana Supreme Court· 4/26/2007

Stephenson v. State

Citations

864 N.E.2d 1022
2007 Ind. LEXIS 282
2007 WL 1229101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that post- conviction court’s lack of specific findings and conclusions was harmless
observing that if an issue is raised and decided on direct appeal, it is res judicata
noting that the due diligence requirement includes a showing of why the evidence at issue was unavailable if it was known to the defense
observing that, if an issue was known and available but not raised on direct appeal, the issue is procedurally foreclosed
discussing Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L. Ed. 2d 215 (1963)
observing, if an issue was raised and decided on direct appeal, it is res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

82 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.