Seventh Circuit· 8/28/2008
Ben-Yisrayl v. Buss
Citations
- 540 F.3d 542
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 18531
- 2008 WL 3931618
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- § 2254(d)(2) sets “a daunting standard, but not insurmountable” (citing Miller–El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 340 (2003))
- § 2254(d)(2) can be satisfied by showing, under § 2254(e)(1
- \[w]e are bound by a state court's interpretations of state law.\
- “Because the [factual] finding falls directly within the Indiana Supreme Court’s analysis of the prejudice element of the Strickland, the finding reflects an ‘unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented.’”
- “The fact' that the Indiana Supreme Court’s decision only partially rested on this fact does not alter the reasonableness of the determination of the Strickland claim.... [E]ven a partial reliance on an erroneous fact finding can support a finding of unreasonableness.”
- discussing Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510, 528 (2003)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Posner, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wood v. AllenSupreme Court· 2010-01-20· cited 1,388×
- Sims v. HyatteSeventh Circuit· 2018-11-27· cited 380×
- Kaczmarek v. RednourSeventh Circuit· 2010-11-17· cited 138×
- Smith v. McKeeSeventh Circuit· 2010-03-16· cited 128×
- Promotor v. PollardSeventh Circuit· 2010-12-14· cited 104×
- Smith v. GaetzSeventh Circuit· 2009-05-04· cited 103×
- William Thompkins, J v. Randy PfistSeventh Circuit· 2012-10-23· cited 99×
- United States v. Alan CisnerosSeventh Circuit· 2017-01-25· cited 82×
- Ebert v. GaetzSeventh Circuit· 2010-06-23· cited 73×
- United States v. Brian ThurmanSeventh Circuit· 2018-05-02· cited 57×
- Ellison v. AcevedoSeventh Circuit· 2010-01-28· cited 37×
- Fields v. ThalerFifth Circuit· 2009-11-12· cited 33×
- United States v. Mark BozovichSeventh Circuit· 2015-04-07· cited 27×
- Bynum v. LemmonSeventh Circuit· 2009-03-27· cited 25×
- Collins v. GaetzSeventh Circuit· 2010-07-13· cited 16×
- United States v. Vickie SandersSeventh Circuit· 2018-12-03· cited 15×
- Corcoran v. BussSeventh Circuit· 2008-12-31· cited 14×
- Sutherland v. GaetzSeventh Circuit· 2009-09-14· cited 13×
- Donald Pierce v. Frank VanihelSeventh Circuit· 2024-02-22· cited 13×
- Ricky Thurston v. Frank VanihelSeventh Circuit· 2022-07-13· cited 12×
Cites
54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court· 2003-02-25· cited 27,550×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 14,568×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court· 1999-06-07· cited 6,799×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 5,961×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court· 2002-05-28· cited 4,309×
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 4,303×
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1972-01-11· cited 2,508×
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 2,073×
- Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 1,931×
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court· 1948-06-14· cited 1,667×
- County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 1,546×
- Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court· 2003-10-20· cited 1,480×
- Reed v. RossSupreme Court· 1984-06-27· cited 1,249×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.