Indiana Supreme Court· 12/23/1996
Cook v. State
Citations
- 675 N.E.2d 687
- 1996 Ind. LEXIS 182
- 1996 WL 732338
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that generally a continuance, rather than exclusion, is the appropriate remedy for the late disclosure of a witness
- a continuance, rather than exclusion, is the appropriate remedy for the late disclosure of a witness
- trial court erred in excluding Cook’s witness; although Cook failed to timely disclose the witness to the State, the State had named the witness in its own discovery materials and was aware of the substance of her testimony well in advance of trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Selby, Boehm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ben-Yisrayl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-05-25· cited 315×
- Lampkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-10-09· cited 156×
- Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-05-25· cited 142×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-02-19· cited 138×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-07-23· cited 77×
- Benefiel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-09-29· cited 70×
- Matheney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-11-24· cited 70×
- Coleman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-04-24· cited 66×
- Barker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-06-12· cited 62×
- Crain v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-10-20· cited 61×
- Rouster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-02-19· cited 61×
- Jones v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-05-04· cited 54×
- Etienne v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-09-28· cited 48×
- Farris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-11-22· cited 43×
- Moffitt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-11-05· cited 41×
- Conrad v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-04-30· cited 41×
- Rohr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-05-15· cited 37×
- Dickenson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-10-13· cited 37×
- Danks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-08-03· cited 34×
- Dunlap v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-01-29· cited 33×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Fleener v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-10-31· cited 155×
- Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-05-24· cited 140×
- Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-11-28· cited 70×
- Jenkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-20· cited 68×
- Douglas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-04-24· cited 68×
- Austex, Ltd. v. TexasSupreme Court· 1994-10-03· cited 63×
- Kindred v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-06-28· cited 53×
- Corn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-12-29· cited 35×
- Cate v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-12-14· cited 34×
- Woodcox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-05-27· cited 27×
- Greenlee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-09-18· cited 25×
- Cornelius v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-07-16· cited 18×
- Coppock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-07-31· cited 15×
- Askew v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-12-12· cited 14×
- Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-12-16· cited 10×
- Wilson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-06-13· cited 5×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-03-04· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.