Skip to main content

State v. Moore

Citations

  • 678 N.E.2d 1258
  • 1997 Ind. LEXIS 42
  • 1997 WL 195396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that while egregious error may amount to grounds for a reversal, we will not second-guess strategic tactical decisions made by counsel at trial
  • noting that we do not second-guess strategic decisions requiring reasonable professional judgment even if the strategy or tactic, in hindsight, did not best serve the defendant’s interests
  • “Taking this evidence most favorably to Moore, however, it does not establish that he was actually misled into pleading guilty. There is no showing of a promise or commitment upon which Moore relied in entering his plea.”
  • on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different
  • “Counsel’s conduct is assessed based on facts known at the time and not through hindsight.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Selby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

96 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.