Skip to main content

Wright v. State

Citations

  • 690 N.E.2d 1098
  • 1997 Ind. LEXIS 245
  • 1997 WL 793452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that mistrial was not required when the prosecutor’s improper statement was fleeting and the trial court instructed the jury that the prosecutor’s statement was not evidence
  • affirming denial of mistrial where the prosecutor’s improper statement was “fleeting” and the court instructed the jury that the prosecutor’s statement was not evidence
  • “To preserve an issue regarding the propriety of a closing argument for appeal, a defendant must do more than simply make a prompt objection to the argument. Defendant must also request an admonishment, and if further relief is desired, defendant must move for a mistrial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selby, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

103 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.