Skip to main content

Wright v. State

Citations

  • 581 P.2d 442
  • 94 Nev. 415
  • 1978 Nev. LEXIS 580

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that NRS 200.310(1) \is broad in its sweep\ in the context of considering the circumstances in which the Legislature intended to allow a conviction for first-degree kidnapping based on movement during a robbery
  • reversing kidnapping conviction as incidental to robbery when movement from room to room occurred \only for the short period of time necessary to consummate the robbery\ for purposes of locating valuables
  • reversing kidnapping conviction as incidental to robbery when movement from room to room 19 occurred “only for the short period of time necessary to consummate the robbery” for purposes of locating valuables
  • referring to the “short period of time” during which 12 robbery occurred
  • referring to the \short period of time\ during which robbery occurred
  • Nevada’s kidnapping statute, as a matter of substantive law, requires movement that increases the risk to the victim, over and above that to be expected in any robbery—essen tially, a sufficiency-of-the-evidence determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Batjer, Mowbray, Gunderson, Manou-Kian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.