Indiana Supreme Court· 6/7/2005

Wright v. State

Citations

828 N.E.2d 904
2005 Ind. LEXIS 525
2005 WL 1389956

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a party may not take advantage of an error that he commits or invites
holding defendant’s sufficiency of the evidence argument was a request for the appellate court to reweigh the evidence, which it will not do
explaining that under the invited error doctrine, a party may not take advantage of an error that he commits, invites, or which is the natural consequence of his own neglect or misconduct
a party may not take advantage of an error that he commits, invites, or which is the natural consequence of her own neglect or misconduct
“[A] party may not take advantage of an error that she commits, invites, or which is the natural consequence of her own neglect or misconduct.”
“[A] party may not take advantage of an error that she commits, invites, or which is the natural consequence of her own neglect or misconduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

154 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.