Skip to main content

Williamson v. State

Citations

  • 707 A.2d 350
  • 1998 Del. LEXIS 28
  • 1998 WL 24276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if a co-defendants' statement is otherwise admissible against the defendant, the court need not conduct a separate Confrontation Clause inquiry.
  • asserting that decisions implicating a constitutionally protected right are subject to de novo review in this Court
  • asserting that decisions implicating a constitutionally protected right are subject to de novo review in this Court
  • reviewing for abuse of discretion the question concerning the admissibility of evidence and reviewing de novo the contention that the Sixth Amendment right to confrontation was violated
  • rejecting argument that two PDWDCF convictions exposed defendant to double punishment and should merge because only one knife was used during two felonies
  • \[W]e review for an abuse of discretion questions concerning the admissibility of evidence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Holland, Hartnett, Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.