Washington v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a defendant’s two convictions for first-degree robbery that involved the same victim and took place almost contemporaneously because the evidence showed that the defendant had formed separate intents to commit the robberies
• finding separate intents where the defendant had robbed the victim, told the victim to leave the premises, and then, after the victim had started to run to his car, said: \No. F* * * that. Give me your keys.\
• double jeopardy protects a defendant against a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Poon v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2005-07-28· cited 50×
• Spencer v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2005-03-01· cited 21×
• Wilson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2008-06-10· cited 7×
• Chambers v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2014-05-29· cited 5×
• Carletti v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2008-12-03· cited 4×
• Newton v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2008-11-25
• Spencer v. Carroll
  D. Delaware· 2006-09-19
• McGriff v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2023-01-27
• State v. Melendez
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2023-11-30
• Damiani-Melendez v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2024-05-20

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weber v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1988-08-23· cited 89×
• Dwight Rashad v. Sherry Burt
  Sixth Circuit· 1997-03-14· cited 65×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2002-05-09· cited 50×
• Williamson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1998-01-16· cited 44×
• LeCompte v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1986-10-21· cited 36×
• Feddiman v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-02-22· cited 34×
• Wyant v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1986-12-16· cited 26×
• Handy v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2002-07-24· cited 14×