Supreme Court of Delaware· 1/17/1983
Weber v. State
Citations
- 457 A.2d 674
- 1983 Del. LEXIS 367
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the difference between second degree murder and manslaughter hangs on the statutory language here in question [i.e. element of “cruel, wicked, and depraved indifference to human life”].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herrmann, Horsey, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 3,339×
- State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court· 1994-05-09· cited 598×
- Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-02-29· cited 204×
- People v. McCauleyIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 188×
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-07· cited 167×
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-23· cited 140×
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-02-02· cited 138×
- State v. EarlsWashington Supreme Court· 1991-02-14· cited 95×
- Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-08-23· cited 89×
- Lodowski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-03-24· cited 74×
- State v. HackfordUtah Supreme Court· 1987-04-22· cited 62×
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-06-26· cited 61×
- Bryan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1990-03-02· cited 58×
- State v. BeckSupreme Court of Missouri· 1985-04-02· cited 57×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2007-12-12· cited 57×
- People v. HollandIllinois Supreme Court· 1987-12-21· cited 52×
- Lovett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1986-10-09· cited 49×
- Michael v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-07-10· cited 45×
- People v. GriggsIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-11-30· cited 45×
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-02-24· cited 2,903×
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 2,732×
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 1,437×
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 1,364×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-05· cited 917×
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals· 1976-05-04· cited 737×
- Alcorta v. TexasSupreme Court· 1957-11-12· cited 405×
- White v. RagenSupreme Court· 1945-04-23· cited 338×
- People v. ArthurNew York Court of Appeals· 1968-06-14· cited 244×
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1981-11-18· cited 172×
- Reginald Carter v. Lowell D. Hewitt, Superintendent John Fuiek, C.O. Duane D. Pyles, C.O. And Gilbert Levi, C.O.Third Circuit· 1980-02-27· cited 160×
- State v. HaynesOregon Supreme Court· 1979-11-06· cited 129×
- Commonwealth v. McKennaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1969-02-05· cited 107×
- United States v. Leonard James and Otto SeboldSecond Circuit· 1979-12-18· cited 106×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.